![]() ![]() We’re treated to well-designed sets, and trips throughout the Galaxy. And the production value seems high enough. Sure, there aren’t sweeping shots of the Enterprise in space-dock that last for minutes at a time, but honestly, the movie is better for it. Although, I don’t think the ending is much of a surprise)Īlthough made on a much smaller budget than its predecessor, I think you would be hard pressed to know it. ( Spoilers ahead if you haven’t seen this movie. But whether I liked it or not isn’t entirely the point… If you’re just reading this to find out if I liked the movie or not, I’ll tell you now it’s a 9/10. Star Trek I is not a bad Star Trek movie.īut Star Trek II? Well, the Wrath of Khan is a great Star Trek movie. It was a high-budget adventure low on story but still full of character moments and a beautiful ship. If you’ll recall, I rather enjoyed watching Star Trek I. I’m actually here to talk about the second film in my rewatch, and almost certainly, the most iconic. Wrath of Khan isn’t my favorite TOS movie, but it’s a great line to drop anytime someone wants to talk about Into Darkness.Īnyways, this blog isn’t about The Big Bang Theory, and there will be plenty of time later to bash the JJ films. The Big Bang Theory, “The Lizard-Spock Expansion” Sheldon: Alright, will you at least stipulate that Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home is inarguably the best? In that exchange, two main characters are arguing over which Star Trek movie is the worst (Star Trek I or Star Trek V), and this devolves into a brief dialogue over the best Star Trek film: ![]() And, as I was watching the second Star Trek movie, Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan*, I kept thinking back to an exchange from an early season of the sitcom. I’m not a huge fan of The Big Bang Theory for a lot of reasons that really aren’t germane to this blog, but every once in a while, the show hits on something which so perfectly captures nerd fandom, that I can’t help but quote it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |